For many years, schools and universities loved nearly unquestioned public help as a few of America’s most necessary establishments. Like most establishments, they’ve been knocked off that pedestal lately, amid rising questions not about whether or not increased training stays necessary however whether or not it’s out there, reasonably priced and precious sufficient.
This week’s episode of The Key’s the primary in a three-part collection on the idea of “worth” in increased training, made attainable by the Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis. The subject has gotten growing consideration as faculty costs and pupil debt proceed to rise and coverage makers develop knowledge displaying the return on funding for particular educational applications.
At present’s episode seems to be at a number of current surveys of public attitudes about increased training. Contributors embody Sophie Nguyen, senior coverage analyst with New America’s Training Program, which publishes Various Levels and quite a few different surveys about increased training; David Schleifer, vice chairman and director of analysis at Public Agenda, a nationwide analysis group; and Natasha Quadlin, an affiliate professor of sociology on the College of California, Los Angeles, and co-author of Who Ought to Pay? Larger Training, Accountability, and the Public, revealed this yr by the Russell Sage Basis.
Hosted by Inside Larger Ed Editor Doug Lederman.
This episode was made attainable by Invoice & Melinda Gates Basis