Within the wake of the capturing earlier this yr in Uvalde, Texas, that left 19 college students and two academics lifeless, the inevitable calls to arm academics have returned—and loudly.
In Ohio, the governor has signed a invoice that may enable academics to hold weapons in school after solely 24 hours of coaching. In Mississippi, the state board of schooling lately voted in favor of a coverage that may make it simpler for academics to hold weapons in school.
Presently, no less than 28 states enable colleges to arm employees members aside from police or college safety, in keeping with a 2020 RAND Company examine.
In Florida, greater than half of college districts enable employees to hold weapons—a response to the 2018 mass capturing at Marjory Stoneman Douglas Excessive Faculty in Parkland.
In different states, reminiscent of Arkansas and Colorado, there are not any insurance policies allowing armed college personnel but in addition no legal guidelines explicitly prohibiting it, leaving room for state policymakers and college officers to determine and even encourage the arming of academics and different employees members within the identify of security.
The calls to arm academics resurface every time a tragedy like Uvalde happens, by those that insist that weapons carried by college employees members are an appropriate response to high school violence. But there’s no analysis to assist the concept extra weapons in class buildings truly make college students safer. And I might argue the other is true. Between 2014 and 2018, the Related Press discovered, there have been greater than 30 incidents involving a firearm introduced to a college by a regulation enforcement officer or that concerned a instructor improperly discharging or shedding management of a weapon.