A preprint examine on the hyperlink between scholarly efficiency and compensation finds that cumulative analysis productiveness was extra strongly associated to compensation for males versus ladies—however solely in STEM fields, not within the social and behavioral sciences. In STEM, ladies with the comparatively excessive h-index productiveness and quotation measure of 49 had been paid $6,000 lower than their male counterparts at that stage, for instance. The authors, who studied 3,033 researchers from 17 research-intensive universities, advocate that establishments replace their compensation formulation and carry out routine pay-equity analyses.
Co-author Christiane Spitzmüller, vice provost for tutorial affairs and technique on the College of California, Merced, informed Science that current analysis means that the h-index metric favors males in some ways, and that her personal examine due to this fact in all probability underestimates gendered variations in pay. “You in all probability have an excellent starker impact for girls who … do extra on dimensions that aren’t rewarded with a excessive h-index,” corresponding to mentoring and different service work, she stated.